Matisse Farzam vs Christopher Li Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Nov at 06:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Farzam vs C. Li

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

PER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Farzam 0 - 1 Li
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matisse Farzam winning 0 and Christopher Li winning 2. The last match between Christopher Li and Matisse Farzam was at the M15 Orlando, 14-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Li getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Farzam | 0 |
| Li | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Orlando(11-14-25)
M. Farzam vs C. Li H2H Profile
M. Farzam vs C. Li Match Preview:
- How do second serve performances compare recently between the two players? Matisse Farzam has won 39.36% of points on their second serve, while Christopher Li leads with 44.02%.
- Considering return game stats, Farzam captures 35.14% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Li secures a higher percentage of 49.34%. However, for first serve returns, Farzam has a slight advantage with 34.65% compared to Li's 30.24%.
- Which player performs better under pressure? Farzam has saved 62.86% of breakpoints recently, outperforming Li, who has managed to save 54.81%.
- In terms of overall performance, Farzam has a winning record of 75% over the last year, while Li has a slightly lower win rate of 58.82%.
- What is the best surface for each player? Farzam shines on clay courts with a 71% win rate, while Li excels on indoor hard courts with the same percentage.
- Both players have primarily competed in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Farzam winning 75% of his matches and Li 66.67%.
- Farzam has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 219.5 compared to Li's 470.47.
- In deciding set scenarios, Farzam struggles with a 0% win rate, while Li has a solid 67% success rate.
- Why monitor breakpoint conversions? Farzam converts 33.33% of his opportunities, slightly behind Li's 36.51%.
Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):
In recent months, Christopher Li demonstrates a slight edge in second serve efficiency and has superior return game capabilities, particularly against opponents' second serves. These factors are significant indicators of potential dominance in crucial match situations.
Matisse Farzam shines under pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, and shows a strong record on clay courts. However, his absolute struggle in deciding sets could be a pivotal factor against the more experienced Li.
With a commendable consistency of Li converting breakpoints and winning a significant percentage of deciding sets, combined with his competitive spirit on his favored indoor hard courts, he seems prepared to leverage these advantages.
Based on current statistics and performance trends, Christopher Li is favored to win the upcoming tennis match.
Matisse Farzam vs Christopher Li Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Farzam vs C. Li H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:29:38 | Average Match Time | 1:29:38 |
| 64% (38/59) | 1st Serve % | 77% (40/52) |
| 39% (15/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 48% (25/52) | Return Points Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Farzam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
C. Li Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 0-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||

M. Farzam vs C. Li Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.15% (6/7) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.65% (18/19) |
| 45.16% (14/17) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.57% (44/43) |
| 48.68% (148/156) | Games Win/Loss | 51.74% (402/375) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 55 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 114 |
| 1:13:50 | Average Match Time | 1:35:41 |
| 293.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.68 |
| 62% (365/586) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1359/2115) |
| 60% (220/365) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (844/1359) |
| 52% (116/221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (344/756) |
| 39% (22/57) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (112/268) |
| 39% (231/587) | Return Points Win % | 43% (928/2157) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Futures W/L | 54.55% (18/15) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (18/37) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 60% (3/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 67% (6/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 68% (22/15) |
| 33% (6/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 32% (22/7) |
| 29% (7/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (15/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
